Once upon a time, financial advisors welcomed every new client to their doorsteps with a big warm smile and a thick pile of forms to fill in. That meant advisors often spent time doing tedious administrative tasks instead of actually making deep and meaningful connections with their clients.
From keying in repetitive basic information, chasing after them for a miss-typed phone number, making sure all the documents are in good order, you name it; advisors had to do it all.
Nowadays, with workflow digitization solutions present at almost every corner of the wealth management industry, advisors are more and more comfortable delegating those manual tasks to technology.
We’ve mapped together advisors' and automation experts’ opinions on the journey of adopting digital automated workflows; the past, the present and the future from our latest e-book “In Pursuit of Efficiency: Working with Technology to De-paper Wealth Management Processes” released in early 2022.
This is to draw a complete picture of advisors’ experience throughout the process and learn how firms achieved their competitive advantage by increasing both their employees’ and end customers’ satisfaction.
Did you know that advisors spend 60-70% of their time on non-advisory tasks? This is because most of them still work with legacy IT systems or sometimes even worse, spreadsheets. Not surprisingly, out of the 53 advisors that we surveyed in the e-book, most agree that these non-revenue-generating activities cause inefficiency.
“Transactional communication with clients takes time away from doing deep advisory work,” — Survey respondent.
To make matters worse, firms that still require wet signatures find themselves creating friction between advisors and clients. Not only is it super time-consuming, but it also shows potential customers that firms are not making enough effort to be innovative and are still “stuck” with outdated systems.
Making clients think that your system is outdated is a thing, but involving them in those legacy systems is another story.
“We had some clients who didn’t have access to a printer anymore. They had in the past relied on their office printers… That led to us either having to wait until they got access to a printer or mailing out documents via snail mail”
There’s no doubt that mailing documents should no longer be an option for correspondence since it can take up to 4 business days for each delivery. Especially now with more and more compliance requirements regarding user access, these manual processes risk serious data breaches and can damage the company’s reputation.
Unfortunately, it is nearly impossible for advisors to keep up with new compliance requirements while paying close attention to their client relationships. Therefore, many technology solutions like digital vaults were created to provide a balance between being compliant and doing advisory activities.
When searching for a solution, look for certain signs indicating that the provider cares about protecting your data and meeting compliant standards. Some rigorous compliance certificates include SOC 2 - Type 1 and 2, ISO 27001, Adobe Approved Trust List, and many more.
Adopting technology is definitely a win-win for financial managers and companies after successfully implementing automated solutions. The Royal Bank of Canada estimates that e-signatures alone save them approximately $8M per year in administrative costs. (According to the E-book)
These innovations also make advisors’ lives easier by completely eliminating a considerable part of their day wasted on boring administrative tasks. Human-made and unavoidable errors are also radicated thanks to automated grammar checks and pre-populated data.
“From manually keying in data on documents to having [the system] actually pull all the documents needed and have them auto-populate! That reduces errors and repetition which translates into time savings.” - Advisor Anecdote
Imagine what advisors could do with all this data recorded and secured in an easy-to-access file. Keeping track of countless holidays and special occasions, and sending and resending documents for annual refresh has never been easier.
“Digital onboarding is great, but once you have the data in your system, you can do a lot more than you could before. With technology, you have the client’s IPS, objectives, horizon, tolerances, and ID all on file and codified. There are all kinds of opportunities to grow your top-line revenue with technology.”
This will ultimately lift the burden off advisors’ shoulders and give them more time to focus on what actually matters. Nurturing a deep and meaningful relationship with clients should always be the providers’ number one priority. When done right, not only does it help loyal customers stick around longer, but it also generates new referrals and prospects.
With the revised KYC guidelines released by the Investment Industry Regulatory Organization of Canada (IIROC) in 2021, a more well-rounded onboarding process is highly required. To be more specific, IIROC determined that investors’ interest in investing in accordance with ESG criteria and other personal preferences should be discussed and included in wealth managers’ KYC questions.
This requires providers to conduct more value-based and holistic conversations with their clients right from the get-go in order to fully understand their values and goals.
Automation is the right answer to enhance KYC practices. In fact, a recent Advisor360° survey shows that advisors’ biggest challenge is the lack of automation and streamline internal operating systems.
“Two-thirds (67%) of advisors spent two hours or more generating reporting for client meetings, and 25% of those advisors considered client onboarding processes a significant constraint.” (David Reeve, Investment Executive). Technology that can eliminate these tasks will free advisors up and give them back the time to take care of their clients.
It is 100% true that data is the new resource and it is never too late to start gathering and leveraging this “pure gold”, especially now that the process to do so has never been easier with digital solutions and tools.
Client onboarding is an area of focus for advisors who are thinking about going digital. Often because this is typically an onerous task, but also the first interaction with a new client. Automating this first impression can make things smoother for the investor.
New investors will definitely appreciate the lack of friction because the manual process can feel intimidating, time-consuming and inconvenient.
Adopting modern and easy-to-use software that makes advisors’ lives easier will also help firms attain and attract new wealth management talents. In this digital age where everything is hybrid, it is absolutely necessary to keep up-to-date and use technology as a competitive advantage.
Image Credits
Feature Image: Photo by Dylan Gillis on Unsplash
So in my view an appropriately diversified portfolio should have enough exposure to different asset classes, that its able to withstand a wide range of market disruptions. Usually, it’s some kind of negative or positive event… they’ll affect different asset classes differently. So by having your eggs in different baskets you’ll be well insulated from major risk. For example, there’s some kind of change in the housing market… both by having some exposure to it, you won’t miss out on the opportunity to make money. But if it’s something negative, you’re also not going to lose all your money if all of it were in the housing market for example. So at a high level, a properly diversified portfolio should grow in a growing market and yet not be at risk of major losses in a declining market.
You asked also about an efficiently diversified portfolio, and I would say that that’s a portfolio that achieves those goals with a minimum of different positions. There’s a lot of good reasons to have fewer positions in your portfolio. Being less complex means a portfolio is easier to rebalance and administer. Every time part of your portfolio goes up or down, you're going to need to rebalance it a little to make sure that it stays with the right allocations and the fewer positions you have, the easier it is to do that..the less trading fees you incur doing that.
There is a tradeoff between being completely diversified and being efficiently diversified. If you were completely diversified then you’d have a proportional segment of absolutely everything you could invest in under the sun, like shares of palm oil futures or something like that. I don’t think everyone should have palm oil futures in their portfolio but I’m not a wealth manager. I think it comes down to your portfolio and how large it is (probably the Canada Pension Plan has a proportion of palm oil futures in it). You’re going to have to talk to your advisor and choose a degree of complexity that’s right for your portfolio.
CN: Let’s just take a step back - what does a typical portfolio look like and has that changed over time?
RB: Yeah, so I'm not entirely sure what a typical portfolio looks like these days because it's actually changed quite a lot over time. I think common wisdom used to be that the classic balanced portfolio was 60% public stocks and 40% bonds. These days that's ancient history. Most would say that the bond allocation should be a lot lower these days in this age of unprecedented low-interest rates. These days it’s the stock portfolio that’s been driving a lot of the growth. I think a well-diversified portfolio in the modern era should absolutely include exposure to all kinds of alternative assets (that aren't even really that alternative but still kind of fall out of that traditional bucket). So you know I mentioned real estate, private companies, maybe for example commodities or other types of investments. So I think that there are a lot of things that you can invest in and your advisor can guide you on what’s appropriate for you.
CN: Yeah that makes a lot of sense. Talking about alternative investments, we’ve heard a lot this year about ESGs, impact investing, alternative investments… do you think there’s more of an appetite today for these types of investments than in the last ten years?
RB: Yeah that’s a topic that’s close to my heart having previously started an impact investment company. It’s definitely been a gigantic increase in interest. I think when I started my previous company we were speaking to large wealth managers and having them say “we’re barely getting a grip on early ideas.” Like not including gun manufacturers or tobacco companies, and now these same companies are launching impact portfolios and marketing this aggressively. So there’s definitely been a seat change, it’s a real industry, and there’s a lot of studies out there and data showing that ESG or impact investing can equal or outperform non-impact investments. So I think it’s a huge part of the market these days. That said, one of the things that’s driving it is people’s interest in it. I think that one of the stories of the investment industry has been the personalization of it. People’s portfolios are being tailored to their own needs and circumstances. Impact investing is definitely a piece of that. People are environmentalists, but an institution is not an environmentalist. It doesn’t live and breathe the impact on the environment the way an individual does. The person who is active in the David Suzuki Foundation for example is going to be active as an impact investor and it’s appropriate for them to be.
That’s a great question. I think there's a lot of advantages and you gain a lot with an automated platform. For me, it's a lot easier to manage. I have some of my money in one of these platforms and I barely think about it. It's being rebalanced all the time. The costs are much lower in terms of expense ratio for the same kind of rebalancing. Again you're missing a lot with that, but on just the mechanical portfolio rebalancing you're getting a great deal there. I would say that two other advantages are up-to-the-minute reporting, so you always have that login where you can see your position, see how your portfolio is doing historically. And finally, this is an advantage for me and anyone who doesn't love doing taxes, but typically they’ll take care of your tax forms for you, and end up with much simpler tax forms, so it kind of works out what your cost basis was and how much you have to report.
CN: So let's talk about the other side of the coin then...what are the risks of not having a seasoned professional managing your money?
RB: I wouldn’t exactly phrase the question that way. You know it's more what’s the benefits of having a real wealth manager? Some of the clients of robo advisory firms may not even be aware that they're missing out. A wealth manager isn't just balancing your stocks and bonds, that's kind of the very lowest mechanical level of what you get out of the wealth manager. Really they're your advisor on your life. Intimately intertwined with you because you're thinking about retirement planning, on planning for college for your kids, when is the right time to buy a house, and when should you get life insurance, for example. An advisor can help you with all of those decisions and they can connect you with service providers like a mortgage broker when you may be in need of one. So I think that you get a lot of value out of having one of these advisers, particularly when you get to a stage in life when these kinds of services are more about the long-term and your life circumstances are far more critical.
CN: There are clearly pros and cons and two sides of the story depending on who you're asking. Like you said, what stage of their life they’re in ...but do you think the platforms that we’re seeing emerging like to Qtrade, Wealthsimple, and all the rest will ever become status quo?
RB: Yeah, I do actually. I think that similarly to how you know we’re using online platforms to automate everything for us (I can’t think of the last time I used to travel for example), everything you’re going to be trying to do with your money is going to be automated, and it’s going to be appropriate to be handled by one of these one of these platforms. In particular, for most people at an early stage in their lives that have few assets to manage, not a lot of complexity, not a very extended personal family circumstance, it’s gonna make a lot of sense to have a low fee robo worry about it. But at some point their life circumstances are going to get more complex and you’re gonna get married, or maybe you’re not, or you may have other objectives that you may want some advice on and at that point it may make sense to either supplement the robo advisory portion of your portfolio, or graduate to a more holistic wealth management view.
CN: Thank you so much Raph, these answers were great. It’s always insightful chatting with you so thanks for sharing those answers with us today.
RB: It’s my pleasure.