If you work in wealth, you know that most of your rules are set by the securities regulators, with one important exception: how you check the identity of your clients. In Canada, those rules are set by FINTRAC, the government agency charged with stopping financial crime. These directives ensure the wealth management industry has robust standards for verifying clientele and provide a barrier against bad actors looking to launder money and finance terrorism.
Any wealth management professional should have a basic understanding of these guidelines. Unfortunately, official FINTRAC guidelines are often difficult to analyze and glean actionable information. This article will provide a step-by-step breakdown of the standards established by FINTRAC in common language. If you have any further questions about these guidelines, please refer to the official FINTRAC guidelines.
Verifying a person or entity’s identity is usually done via a government-issued photo ID or credit file, but other options are available for special cases.
Identity verification processes not only provide strong protection against money laundering but they also allow wealth management firms to better understand their clients and evaluate their risk profiles and tolerances.
FINTRAC outlines several different methods for specific situations, each with unique requirements. This process isn’t just about verifying identity—it’s about saving the information and storing it in your client file in an auditable manner.
When building a FINTRAC compliance program, it is crucial to outline the measures taken to verify someone’s identity, including those that confirm authentic, valid, and current credentials. It’s also a good idea to include any measures you intend to use to update that information on a regular basis in case of any changes.
Below is a simplified version of the FINTRAC guidelines, focusing on the essential information required for each step:
This method requires an identity document from a federal, provincial, or territorial government (or an equivalent document from a foreign government).
This document must be authentic, valid, and current and contain the following information:
For this method to be valid, you must record the following information:
The photo ID must be matched to the person opening the account’s name and appearance. However, this process must be performed in person, making it a clunky and suboptimal choice for firms that want to service clients efficiently.
Fortunately, if you can’t meet the client in person, you can fall back on using the photo ID as one of the factors in the dual-process method, by supplementing it with a credit file lookup or another document.
This method implies using a Canadian credit bureau to run a credit file information check for identification purposes, which can be done directly within Mako. Equifax and Transunion offer these services in Canada. This check must include the following up-to-date information:
Once this check is successful, you must keep the following information for your records:
The credit file method is our preferred method of identity validation, as it provides a great customer experience, and can be integrated directly into a Mako digital onboarding workflow using APIs, allowing clients to sign up for your services quickly and easily.
This method is done by combining two of the following steps:
The two categories of information sources used to verify a person’s identity must be different. If a credit bureau aggregates tradelines, then each tradeline can be used as a distinct source. Mako also offers this method.
Keep the following information for your records in the event of an audit:
There is an interesting loophole here: if you try to use the Credit File method and the credit report has existed for more than six months but less than three years, you can supplement the credit file with a second factor to consider the client validated.
This method relies on verification through an affiliate that is part of the same registered entity (RE) as your business, as described in section G of this document. If this RE has executed a valid and current identity verification via the government ID, you can use the same data for your purposes.
You must confirm and keep the following information for your records:
If another RE whose data you have access to has previously confirmed a person’s identity via the government ID method, you can rely on this information to perform an identity check.
During this type of check, the following information must be checked and preserved in your records:
If you have previously verified a person’s identity and the information is still valid and current, you can use the previous check as a FINTRAC-compliant method. However, it is your responsibility to maintain this information and ensure it is refreshed on a regular basis.
According to the FINTRAC guidelines, an entity can be a corporation, a trust, a partnership, a fund, or an unincorporated association or organization. However, the rules are slightly different for corporations:
Verifying the identity of an entity is done by offering documents stating the date and members of the entity, such as:
This information must be kept and maintained in your records for both:
Wealth and asset management firms also have to validate the identity of the representatives of the entity, specifically those authorized to open or transact on the account – not necessarily the ultimate beneficial owners. The good news is you’re only required to verify the identity of a maximum of three individuals on a single entity. To do that, you can use the individual methods listed above.
Since it's common in wealth and asset management to onboard households that include a couple of key individuals and a holding company or family trust, Mako designs household onboarding workflows that ensure both entities and individuals are validated in the right order and eliminate duplicate validations.
The guidelines may seem overwhelming at first, but it’s crucial to have a basic understanding of them in order to be compliant. However, the key takeaway here is that this process is far too time-consuming and complicated to undertake on your own.
By using a digital onboarding platform like Mako, you can fully automate this process and dramatically reduce the rate of error compared to manual verification, for both entities and individuals. Speeding up this necessary step eliminates frustration for your clients, gives your advisors time to focus on building their client relationships, and improves the efficiency of your back office.
Contact us today for a demo if you’re ready to discuss automating your KYC process.
Photo by Christopher Austin on Unsplash
So in my view an appropriately diversified portfolio should have enough exposure to different asset classes, that its able to withstand a wide range of market disruptions. Usually, it’s some kind of negative or positive event… they’ll affect different asset classes differently. So by having your eggs in different baskets you’ll be well insulated from major risk. For example, there’s some kind of change in the housing market… both by having some exposure to it, you won’t miss out on the opportunity to make money. But if it’s something negative, you’re also not going to lose all your money if all of it were in the housing market for example. So at a high level, a properly diversified portfolio should grow in a growing market and yet not be at risk of major losses in a declining market.
You asked also about an efficiently diversified portfolio, and I would say that that’s a portfolio that achieves those goals with a minimum of different positions. There’s a lot of good reasons to have fewer positions in your portfolio. Being less complex means a portfolio is easier to rebalance and administer. Every time part of your portfolio goes up or down, you're going to need to rebalance it a little to make sure that it stays with the right allocations and the fewer positions you have, the easier it is to do that..the less trading fees you incur doing that.
There is a tradeoff between being completely diversified and being efficiently diversified. If you were completely diversified then you’d have a proportional segment of absolutely everything you could invest in under the sun, like shares of palm oil futures or something like that. I don’t think everyone should have palm oil futures in their portfolio but I’m not a wealth manager. I think it comes down to your portfolio and how large it is (probably the Canada Pension Plan has a proportion of palm oil futures in it). You’re going to have to talk to your advisor and choose a degree of complexity that’s right for your portfolio.
CN: Let’s just take a step back - what does a typical portfolio look like and has that changed over time?
RB: Yeah, so I'm not entirely sure what a typical portfolio looks like these days because it's actually changed quite a lot over time. I think common wisdom used to be that the classic balanced portfolio was 60% public stocks and 40% bonds. These days that's ancient history. Most would say that the bond allocation should be a lot lower these days in this age of unprecedented low-interest rates. These days it’s the stock portfolio that’s been driving a lot of the growth. I think a well-diversified portfolio in the modern era should absolutely include exposure to all kinds of alternative assets (that aren't even really that alternative but still kind of fall out of that traditional bucket). So you know I mentioned real estate, private companies, maybe for example commodities or other types of investments. So I think that there are a lot of things that you can invest in and your advisor can guide you on what’s appropriate for you.
CN: Yeah that makes a lot of sense. Talking about alternative investments, we’ve heard a lot this year about ESGs, impact investing, alternative investments… do you think there’s more of an appetite today for these types of investments than in the last ten years?
RB: Yeah that’s a topic that’s close to my heart having previously started an impact investment company. It’s definitely been a gigantic increase in interest. I think when I started my previous company we were speaking to large wealth managers and having them say “we’re barely getting a grip on early ideas.” Like not including gun manufacturers or tobacco companies, and now these same companies are launching impact portfolios and marketing this aggressively. So there’s definitely been a seat change, it’s a real industry, and there’s a lot of studies out there and data showing that ESG or impact investing can equal or outperform non-impact investments. So I think it’s a huge part of the market these days. That said, one of the things that’s driving it is people’s interest in it. I think that one of the stories of the investment industry has been the personalization of it. People’s portfolios are being tailored to their own needs and circumstances. Impact investing is definitely a piece of that. People are environmentalists, but an institution is not an environmentalist. It doesn’t live and breathe the impact on the environment the way an individual does. The person who is active in the David Suzuki Foundation for example is going to be active as an impact investor and it’s appropriate for them to be.
That’s a great question. I think there's a lot of advantages and you gain a lot with an automated platform. For me, it's a lot easier to manage. I have some of my money in one of these platforms and I barely think about it. It's being rebalanced all the time. The costs are much lower in terms of expense ratio for the same kind of rebalancing. Again you're missing a lot with that, but on just the mechanical portfolio rebalancing you're getting a great deal there. I would say that two other advantages are up-to-the-minute reporting, so you always have that login where you can see your position, see how your portfolio is doing historically. And finally, this is an advantage for me and anyone who doesn't love doing taxes, but typically they’ll take care of your tax forms for you, and end up with much simpler tax forms, so it kind of works out what your cost basis was and how much you have to report.
CN: So let's talk about the other side of the coin then...what are the risks of not having a seasoned professional managing your money?
RB: I wouldn’t exactly phrase the question that way. You know it's more what’s the benefits of having a real wealth manager? Some of the clients of robo advisory firms may not even be aware that they're missing out. A wealth manager isn't just balancing your stocks and bonds, that's kind of the very lowest mechanical level of what you get out of the wealth manager. Really they're your advisor on your life. Intimately intertwined with you because you're thinking about retirement planning, on planning for college for your kids, when is the right time to buy a house, and when should you get life insurance, for example. An advisor can help you with all of those decisions and they can connect you with service providers like a mortgage broker when you may be in need of one. So I think that you get a lot of value out of having one of these advisers, particularly when you get to a stage in life when these kinds of services are more about the long-term and your life circumstances are far more critical.
CN: There are clearly pros and cons and two sides of the story depending on who you're asking. Like you said, what stage of their life they’re in ...but do you think the platforms that we’re seeing emerging like to Qtrade, Wealthsimple, and all the rest will ever become status quo?
RB: Yeah, I do actually. I think that similarly to how you know we’re using online platforms to automate everything for us (I can’t think of the last time I used to travel for example), everything you’re going to be trying to do with your money is going to be automated, and it’s going to be appropriate to be handled by one of these one of these platforms. In particular, for most people at an early stage in their lives that have few assets to manage, not a lot of complexity, not a very extended personal family circumstance, it’s gonna make a lot of sense to have a low fee robo worry about it. But at some point their life circumstances are going to get more complex and you’re gonna get married, or maybe you’re not, or you may have other objectives that you may want some advice on and at that point it may make sense to either supplement the robo advisory portion of your portfolio, or graduate to a more holistic wealth management view.
CN: Thank you so much Raph, these answers were great. It’s always insightful chatting with you so thanks for sharing those answers with us today.
RB: It’s my pleasure.